Wait, are you saying WW1 was nice in what regard?

Because WW1 was ridiculously brutal...

WW1 was all a misunderstanding, and the fault of the remaining "kingdoms". The soldiers didn't actually want to fight, and had no ill feelings for their "enemies"; Which would explain the Christmas Truces that these "enemy" countries had. Soldiers simple fought because they'd be killed if they didn't; civilians made up perhaps 10% of the total death toll from the war since they actually didn't partake in the war, and had absolutely nothing to do with it. The only possible "worse" aspect of WW1 compared to WW2 would be the presence of "Mustard Gas" and flame throwers (Although this horrendous weapon was also used in WW2).

WW2 mostly involved civilians, with over 50% of total deaths belonging to them. And need I mention why? Concentration camps, the atomic bomb, the actual hate of the "Aryans" towards non-"Aryans".

Wars aren't supposed to include civilians. That's why WW2 is called a Holocaust.

~10 million of the ~20 million deaths caused by WWI were civilians (getting off topic). There is no such thing as a "nice" war, least of all either of the World Wars.

This post was last modified: 09-23-2008 08:50 PM by GlueGun18.

Oddly enough if they hadn't have dropped the bomb on Hiroshima, chances are Japan as a country, and a cultural identity, would not exist today.

Imperial Japan had the rare sort of fanaticism that not even modern day fundamentalists can match.