12-21-2007, 06:29 PM
"If you can't decide which version of Devil May Cry 4 - Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3 - to purchase, the official Capcom blog has posted the above GameTrailers video to indicate that there is no difference between the versions. Glibs the poster, "Well, the corporate answer is 'You should buy both and give one to a friend. Perhaps a third to put under your pillow,'" later adding, "As I've been telling people for months, there ain't no difference between the two."
One major deciding factor - load times - is not addressed in the footage. If one version takes 20 seconds to load a level and the other takes 2 minutes, then all else equal, we know which version we want to pick up."
Source
This hurts the Playstation camp, because it seems as it was a bigger title for the PS camp than the Xbox camp. However, this quells rumors that the PS3 version was going to be "vastly superior" to the 360 version, and that lead platform would have made any difference.
Actually, as one Joystiq user pointed out:
"PS3 version: Good graphics, good framerate, good sound effects, good music = Great game.
360 version: Same good graphics, same good framerate, same good sound effects, same good music plus achivements, rumble out of the box = Better value."
"If you have a PS3 and a 360, there's no single reason to pick DMC4 on the PS3 over the 360 version.
Only if you want to play it with a controller with bad triggers, without rumble and with an analog stick placed in a bad position.
Plus, probably the 360 version will have more additional content via Live in the future."
If there's no difference, the 360 version does look better, especially since it has
-rumble
-live
-achievements
-most likely faster load times (360 load times are almost ALWAYS better because of DVD faster read rate).
EDIT: Also, this has always been one of the justifications for the Sony 2008 lineup, "... Killzone, DMC4 Superior version, LBP..."
This could really hurt that lineup, which has been taken a beating with KZII and LBP possible delays.
Really, as a previous PS3 owner, it gets old waiting.
One major deciding factor - load times - is not addressed in the footage. If one version takes 20 seconds to load a level and the other takes 2 minutes, then all else equal, we know which version we want to pick up."
Source
This hurts the Playstation camp, because it seems as it was a bigger title for the PS camp than the Xbox camp. However, this quells rumors that the PS3 version was going to be "vastly superior" to the 360 version, and that lead platform would have made any difference.
Actually, as one Joystiq user pointed out:
"PS3 version: Good graphics, good framerate, good sound effects, good music = Great game.
360 version: Same good graphics, same good framerate, same good sound effects, same good music plus achivements, rumble out of the box = Better value."
"If you have a PS3 and a 360, there's no single reason to pick DMC4 on the PS3 over the 360 version.
Only if you want to play it with a controller with bad triggers, without rumble and with an analog stick placed in a bad position.
Plus, probably the 360 version will have more additional content via Live in the future."
If there's no difference, the 360 version does look better, especially since it has
-rumble
-live
-achievements
-most likely faster load times (360 load times are almost ALWAYS better because of DVD faster read rate).
EDIT: Also, this has always been one of the justifications for the Sony 2008 lineup, "... Killzone, DMC4 Superior version, LBP..."
This could really hurt that lineup, which has been taken a beating with KZII and LBP possible delays.
Really, as a previous PS3 owner, it gets old waiting.
