WiiLoaded.com - Wii Forum and News

Full Version: EA: No Rock Band for you
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
at 200 bucks the game would have to be orgasmic to be worth it, i dont think it is so i am out
a game worth 200? why would i buy that, i'de rather buy GH3 which is alittle worse but much more economic
its 160$. Wich seems fair, consider thats only 70$ more then GH3, and an extra guitar (the X-plorer at that) is 70$. so I'm guessing they'd jack up the price of the Les Paul another 10 is not 20$.

And with rock band you're getting a drum set and a mic. I'd say its the better buy. (although, I definatly don't think the price for either is anything but a rip-off, seriously, 70$ for a chunk of plastic shaped as a guitar? And how many less buttons does it have then a regular controller? The wiring has got to be a lot simpiler.)
Its also way more fun when playing multiplayer. (which is all I play with my GH3 at the moment.)
wow, i am so happy i have an xbox...
Big Grin
Eh, no worries, I'll just play it on my 360.

ZoSo Wrote:
Plus, it is boring unless you have all 4 people.


Rhythm games are boring solo? Guitar Hero says hi.

This girl at my school, who hardly ever played video games before got it and says that it is "hillariously fun"
I think the wii will become inportant when it starts outselling the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 so developers can see that poeple actually like the wii and games will be supported on it. Hmm...I wonder when Alex will look at a sales chart?
Well I think Guitar will sell amazingly whatever system its released on, plus this game could be seen as a casual game by some. Which means the hardcore players buy it, but the casual players also buy this because it generally looks fun to play. Its a win win situation for Activision.

I think if they released Rock Band on Wii it was would see similar success.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's