03-31-2008, 01:28 PM
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=526
I sincerely hope this isn't an april fools, because this would be great news for PC gaming.
Raytracing is much better than raster rendering as it allows for realistic reflections and shadows.
you may need to double-take, but this would be typical in-game graphics:
yep, that's computer generated, and looking at the power available in current home PCs this kind of rendering is looking more and more accessible for a gaming environment.
Hell, it only takes 3 PS3s to run at the 60 fps required for TV output!:
View this on YouTube
Bare in mind the average gaming PC at the present can easily outperform a PS3, by the time Raytracing has enough support it'll be easy to hit these frame rates.
I sincerely hope this isn't an april fools, because this would be great news for PC gaming.
Raytracing is much better than raster rendering as it allows for realistic reflections and shadows.
you may need to double-take, but this would be typical in-game graphics:

yep, that's computer generated, and looking at the power available in current home PCs this kind of rendering is looking more and more accessible for a gaming environment.
Hell, it only takes 3 PS3s to run at the 60 fps required for TV output!:
View this on YouTube
Bare in mind the average gaming PC at the present can easily outperform a PS3, by the time Raytracing has enough support it'll be easy to hit these frame rates.